Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1996
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on 72 F. Supp. 21 - Boehle v. Electro Metallurgical Co. · Lasater v. Hercules Powder Co. · 73 F. Supp. 288 - Cochran v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. · 72 F. Supp. 690 - Story v. Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corporation · Hearst Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Nor does the lack of jurisdiction seem any the less manifest because jurisdiction existed at the time of the commencement of the various actions. * * * The language of Section 2(d) seems clear and unambiguous. By its terms it excludes jurisdiction of any action or proceeding ‘whether instituted prior to or on or after the date of the enactment of the Act.’ * * * and there is no indication on the face of the complaints that the actions are to enforce liability for claims based upon activities which were compensable in any amount under contract, custom or practice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is no mere technicality to require some semblance of order in a judicial proceeding and it seems little enough to require of plaintiffs that they serve and file a complaint which shall show the title of the action with the names of the parties, together with such formal allegations as may connect them with the claim for relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.