Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 FSUPP2D 1293 - Shufford v. Integon Indemnity Corp.

Shufford v. Integon Indemnity Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta · National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Bowen · Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not only an outright refusal to pay, but also either an unwarranted delay in payment or an insufficient payment can form the grounds for a breach-of-contract claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.