Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F. Supp. 2d 1377 - Williams v. Lear Operations Corp.

73 F. Supp. 2d 1377 - Williams v. Lear Operations Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
October 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Quality Foods Centro America Sa Sa v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation Sa · Linder v. Portocarrero · Walker v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is still necessary that a complaint 'contain either direct or inferential allegations respecting all the material elements necessary to sustain a recovery under some viable legal theory' ") (citations omitted). "Broad Conclusory allegations are inadequate even under the liberal pleading rules of the Fed. R. Civ. P.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.