73 F. Supp. 2d 201 - Hudson v. General Dynamics’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Thomas Hoar Inc v. Sara Lee Corp Greenspan Jaffe & Rosenblatt J D E · Bf Goodrich · Conway v. Icahn & Co. · United States v. Mett · Becher v. Long Island Lighting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clients (e.g., employers considering the substance and logistics of plan amendments) to make full disclosure to their attorneys” (DN 173 p. 9 quoting Mett, 178 F.3d at 1065-66 ) (internal quotations omitted). . Defendants’ assert that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.