Balagula v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2018
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Calderon v. United States District Court · Flanagan v. Johnson · Mickens v. United States · United States v. Macchia · 845 F. Supp. 953 - United States v. Macchia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o hold that the statute of limitations should be extended in this case would allow the statute to be extended indefinitely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“take seriously Congress's desire to accelerate the federal habeas process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.