Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 F. Supp. 2d 477 - Jacques v. Reno

73 F. Supp. 2d 477 - Jacques v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 2001
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Felker v. Turpin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review: “(ii) any other decision or action of the Attorney General the authority for which is specified under this subchapter to be in the discretion of the Attorney General.... ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Does a U.S. district court have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by an alien relating to the denial of release on bond or parole during deportation proceedings?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.