State v. Renon’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Richie (1998), State v. Clark (1996)
62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hulver v. United States · State v. Pinero · 38 Cal. App. 3d 176 - People v. Beyea · State v. Castro · Commonwealth v. Gwaltney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Williams · State v. Alston“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible where such evidence is probative of another fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, modus operandi, or absence of mistake or accident.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Williams · State v. Locken“rouse the jury to overmastering hostility”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.