State v. Wong’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Huggett · State v. Briones · State v. Nakamura
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The prosecuting attorney, the defendant’s probation officer, and the defendant shall be notified by the movant in writing of the time, place, and date of any such hearing, and of the grounds wpon which action under this section is proposed. The prosecuting attorney, the defendant’s probation officer, and the defendant may appear in [sic] the hearing to oppose or support the application, and may submit evidence for the court’s consideration. The defendant shall have the right to be represented by counsel. For purposes of this section the court shall not be bound by the Hawaii rales of evidence, except for the rules pertaining to privileges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Durham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.