Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Idaho 491 - McKee v. Chase

McKee v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Twyford v. Weber (1974), State v. Lámar (1967)

27 state decisions

9019531960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Graff · Danner v. Walters · 125 W. Va. 722 - Bragg v. C. I. Whitten Transfer Co. · Hayward v. Yost · Sanders v. Walden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Photographs, maps, and other drawings, are recognized as proper evidence to supplement the testimony of witnesses where the subject matter of the testimony is difficult to portray without such aids, or where the jury can be given a better understanding of the physical facts with which they are concerned. Their admission is proper to illustrate the testimony. They are also regarded as a proper means of expressing the witness’ testimony. That is, a witness may be unable, by means of words or gestures alone, to convey to the jury an accurate understanding or picture of the relative position of the physical objects or their physical characteristics, without the assistance of photographs or drawings. So, he may make a drawing or a photograph, or identify and adopt such drawing or photograph, made by another, as a means of portraying to the jury facts.which are within his knowledge, and which he is not as well able to portray without such help (citing cases).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This Court has held that changes in the conditions portrayed between the time of the event under investigation and the taking of the photograph do not render the photograph inadmissible if the changes can be explained by a witness, and if the changes are not of such a character as to render the photograph deceptive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.