73 Ind. 111
Decided November 15, 1880
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1880-11-15
<p>Practice. — Misconduct of Juror. — Bill of Exceptions. — Supreme Court.— Affidavits concerning alleged misconduct of jurors must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions or order of court, to present any question thereon in the Supreme Court.</p>
Relies on McDaniel v. Mattingly
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1880-11-15
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1965
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1— We are ashed to reverse the judgment in this case solely on the alleged misconduct of jurors, but the affidavits concerning that misconduct are not made a part of the' record by a bill of exceptions, or by an order of the court. There is therefore no question properly presented for our decision. See McDaniel v. Mattingly, 72 Ind. 349, ■and cases cited.
¶2Judgment affirmed, with costs.