Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 Ind. App. 448

Chastain v. Lindley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1920

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1920-06-17

<p>Appeal. — Review.—Decision.—Conclusiveness.—Where the evidence tends to sustain the decision of the trial court, it will not be disturbed on appeal for insufficiency of evidence.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1920-06-17

Dausman, J.

¶1Appellants instituted this action to review a judgment for errors of law appearing in the proceedings. §§645, 646 Burns 1914, §§614, 615 R. S. 1881. The cause was tried on a transcript of the record made in the original action. The court made a general finding for the appellee and rendered judgment that appellants take nothing by their action. The only alleged error presented here is that the court erred in holding that there is evidence to sustain the decision in the original action. We have examined that evidence and we find that it tends fairly to sustain the decision.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/73/indapp/448 · .json · Public domain