Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 KAN 160 - State v. Appleton

State v. Appleton’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2019

2 district · 14 state decisions

60190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bogue · Asbell v. State · State v. Appleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Verdicts may be set aside and new trials awarded on the application of the defendant; and continuances may be granted to either party in criminal cases for like causes and under the like circumstances as in civil cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]unctuation of a statute is not controlling”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.