Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 KAN 92 - Martindale v. Battey

Martindale v. Battey’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 1952

24 state decisions

90190619101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benson v. Battey · Johnson v. Jones · New v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The change should be allowed only where the proof in support of the application is clear and convincing. But where it is satisfactorily established that the requisite facts exist we think relief should not be denied merely because the evidence rests entirely in parol.” (p. 98.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.