Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 MD 378 - Scharf v. Tasker

Scharf v. Tasker’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Painter v. Mattfeldt (1913), Atkinson v. Sapperstein (1948)

37 state decisions

901891190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'that every law enacted by the General Assembly shall embrace but one subject, and that shall be described in its title.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has nothing at all to do with the object and purpose of the statute, and is manifestly not described in the title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.