Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 MICH 5 - Mathias v. Cramer

Mathias v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1994

1 district · 6 state decisions

30188818901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Louisiana · People Ex Rel. City of Rochester v. Briggs · State ex rel. Walsh v. Dousman · Houseman v. Montgomery · Sparhawk v. Sparhawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ An unconstitutional provision or section in a statute, will not affect the other provisions of the law unless they are essentially and inseparably connected in substance.” Mathias v. Cramer, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.