Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 MINN 150 - State v. Durnam

State v. Durnam’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
12
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Egan v. United States (1923), People v. Coffey (1911)

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions — followed in 12 states

9018981900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kohl v. Lehlback · People v. Squires · Chase v. People · Commonwealth v. Murray · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The disqualification by reason of alienage is one which does not go to either the intelligence or the impartiality of a proposed juror.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.