Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 MISS 46 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1998

7 state decisions

4018951900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unfortunately for the appellant, we are compelled to decide the question of law presented by the exception of the state to the action of the court below in setting aside the first sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “purpose of the statute was to provide an inexpensive, summary, simple method of cross appeal for the state”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.