Arnholt v. Hartwig’s Empirical Analysis
1881
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1926
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dixon v. Hill · Paul v. Fulton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No one but a purchaser for a valuable consideration can claim title to property which has been fraudulently assigned, against the action of attaching creditors. Such purchasers are protected upon the equitable principle .that they should not be deprived of that which they have honestly and without notice of any fraud, bought and paid for in fair dealing with the person holding the legal title. But 'the consideration must in all cases be actually passed before notice. Unless payment has been actually made in some shape, the authorities are quite clear that the purchase will not be upheld. In equity, a purchaser is protected to the extent of the payments actually made, and no further, even where future payments are provided for, unless those are secured in such a manner that the purchaser cannot be relieved against them.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is a settled rule in equity that a purchaser without notice, to be entitled to protection, must not only be so at the time of the contract of conveyance, but must be so at the time of the payment of the purchase money.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Benson v. Watkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.