Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 N.C. App. 83 - State v. Newkirk

73 N.C. App. 83 - State v. Newkirk’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2011

16 state decisions

801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney · State v. Cameron · State v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]wo factors weighing in favor of disclosure are (1) the informer was an actual participant in the crime compared to a mere informant, e.g., Roviaro v. United States, supra; State v. Ketchie, 286 N.C. 387 , 211 S.E. 2d 207 (1975), and (2) the state’s evidence and defendant’s evidence contradict on material facts that the informant could clarify, McLawhorn v. State of North Carolina, 484 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1973); State v. Orr, 28 N.C. App. 317 , 220 S.E.2d 848 (1976). Several factors vitiating against disclosure are whether the defendant admits culpability, offers no defense on the merits, or the evidence independent of the informer’s testimony establishes the accused’s guilt. State v. Cameron, [ 283 N.C. 191, 195 , S.E.2d 481 (1973)].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the state is privileged to withhold from a defendant the identity of a confidential informant, with certain exceptions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.