Razee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1964
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Larson v. Cox · Koen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One of the most vital questions in the whole case was whether the Courier was a newspaper having a general circulation. The provision above quoted was construed in Koen v. State, 35 Neb. 676 , 17 L. R. A. 821, where, after much discussion of the meaning of the word ‘general’ and the expression ‘general circulation,’ it was held that, to charge a felony, the paper must be of general circulation, and that the limitation to one county merely charged a misdemeanor. It was further said: ‘It is not necessary that the newspaper circulate to any considerable extent, if at all, out of tbe state * * *; but it must extend beyond the county in which it is published.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Regan v. Hugus““You are instructed that, to be a newspaper of general circulation, such newspaper must circulate beyond the county where it is published. To have a general circulation, it is not necessary that it circulate in every county of the state, but it must extend beyond the county in which it is published, to have a general circulation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Regan v. Hugus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.