Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Nev. 158 - Scott v. Smith

Scott v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 22 Tenn. App. 356 - Wilson v. Moudy · Singer v. Martin · Anderson v. Anderson · Sobrio v. Cafferata · Lawson v. Fisk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may adopt as the standard of conduct of a reasonable man the requirements of a legislative enactment or an administrative regulation whose purpose is found to be exclusively or in part (a) to protect a class of persons which includes the one whose interest is invaded, and (b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and (c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and (d) to protect that interest against the particular hazard from which the harm results.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.