Biel in Equity, for an injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing a passageway over his land, alleged by the plaintiff to be appurtenant to her lot. Facts found by Chamberlin, J., at the September term, 1904, of the superior court, and transferred without a ruling. Carter owned a lot of land forty-eight feet in width, extending from Pine street in Nashua in an easterly direction 100 feet.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1905-06-29
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2017
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
The only apparent question of law that can arise upon these facts is whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for; and it is evident that she is not, as she shows no title whatever to a right of way over the defendant’s land. The bill should be dismissed.