¶1 The questions presented arise upon the defendant’s exceptions to the admission of evidence. In the absence of *617 a brief in support of tbe exceptions, or other information from the defendant relating to his legal positions, no error is perceived and the exceptions are therefore overruled.
73 N.H. 616
63 A 1118
Barsantee v. Hartford
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 1, 1906
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1906-05-01
<p>Case, for libel. Transferred from the April term, 1905, of the superior court by Stone, J.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1906-05-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2019
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →