State v. Vinegra’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably State v. Alston (1981), In Re Kozlov (1979)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2514 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Griffin v. California · Berger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This statute has the effect of making the target doctrine inapplicable to a public employee insofar as it imposes a duty on him to testify upon matters directly related to the conduct of his office. At the same time it seeks to protect his privilege against self-incrimination by giving him the use and fruits immunity---- [State v. Vinegra, supra, 73 N.J. at 489 , 376 A.2d 150 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“... the receipt by a grand jury of evidence obtained in violation of a person's Fifth Amendment rights does not infect an indictment based on such testimony.... [S]uppression of such grand jury evidence (and fruits thereof) at trial adequately protects a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. [ Id. at 490 , 376 A. 2d 150 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a 'target' of a grand jury proceeding must be advised that he is a target and of his right not to incriminate himself, failing which an indictment based on his testimony will be quashed ... [a] principle [that] grows out of the privilege against self-incriminalion[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.