Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 NJL 621 - Hebrew v. Pulis

Hebrew v. Pulis’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 1991 · most notably Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado (1949), Earl v. Winne (1953)

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

801906191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gold v. Bissell · Pike v. Hanson · Brushaber v. Stegemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the words or conduct are such as to induce a reasonable apprehension of force, and the means of coercion are at hand, a person may be as effectually restrained and deprived of liberty as by prison bars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.