73 Ohio App. 431 - Central Trust Co. v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1992
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is not in the instrument here under consideration any reservation of the right or power to any individual acting separately to revoke. Lucy A. Smith could not revoke as to her indiyidual interests because she had not reserved such power . . ”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The creator of a trust may reserve to himself any use of power, beneficial or in trust, which he might lawfully grant to another, including the power to alter, amend, or revoke such trust”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.