73 Ohio App. 3d 173 - Beard v. Mayfield’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 10 Ohio App. 3d 272 - Whiteleather v. Yosowitz · Ryan v. Connor · Mathis v. Cleveland Public Library · Savransky v. City of Cleveland · Szymanski v. Halle's Department Store
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a nonmoving party has no burden of proof in opposing a motion for summary judgment, when presented with a motion for summary judgment properly supported showing no issue of fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the nonmoving party does have a burden to supply evidentiary materials to support his position that a genuine issue of fact exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.