73 Ohio App. 3d 827 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 112 Ohio App. 3d 521 - State v. Hopfer (1996), State v. Grant (1993)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · State v. Adams · Remmer v. United States · Thomas Patterson v. People of the State of Colorado Ex Rel Attorney General of the State of Colorado · State v. Moreland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) Grounds. A new trial may be granted on motion of the defendant for any of the following causes affecting materially his substantial rights: {¶ 118} "(1) Irregularity in the proceedings, or in any order or ruling of the court, or abuse of discretion by the court, because of which the defendant was prevented from having a fair trial; {¶ 119} "(2) Misconduct of the jury, prosecuting attorney, or the witnesses for the state; . . . {¶ 120} "(E) Invalid grounds for new trial. No motion for a new trial shall be granted or verdict set aside, nor shall any judgment of conviction be reversed in any court because of: {¶ 121} "(5) Any other cause, unless it affirmatively appears from the record that the defendant was prejudiced thereby or was prevented from having a fair trial”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]onversations by a third person with a juror during the progress of a trial for the purpose of influencing the verdict may invalidate the verdict, but where there is nothing in the record to demonstrate that the decision might have been influenced by such a conversation, the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial will not be disturbed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Jury misconduct will not warrant a new trial in the absence of prejudice to the defendant. `It is a long-standing rule * * * that we will not reverse a judgment because of the misconduct of a juror unless prejudice to the complaining party is shown.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.