Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Ohio App. 3d 834 - State v. Underwood

73 Ohio App. 3d 834 - State v. Underwood’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2017

16 state decisions

90199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Phillips · State v. Long · United States v. Hasting · State v. Maurer · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[W]here an expert bases his opinion, in whole or in major part, on facts or data perceived by him, the requirement of Evid.R. 703 has been satisfied.” (Emphasis added.) See State v. Underwood (1991), 73 Ohio App.3d 834 , 598 N.E.2d 822 ; Lambert v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 15 , 606 N.E.2d 983 ; Worthington City Schools v. ABCO Insulation (1992), 84 Ohio App.3d 144 , 616 N.E.2d 550 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by him or admitted in evidence * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.