State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 322 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 325 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Payne (2007), State v. Simpkins (2008)
2 federal appellate · 322 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Perry · Patton v. Diemer · 42 Ohio St. 2d 46 - State v. Milanovich · State v. Adams · 113 Ohio St. 418 - State v. Klingenberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 325 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent a proper bindover procedure pursuant to R.C. 2151.26, the juvenile court has the exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over any case concerning a child who is alleged to be a delinquent.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Isse · State v. Baker“[t]he exclusive subject matter jurisdiction of the juvenile court cannot be waived”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“{¶ 34} “(B) After a complaint has been filed alleging that a child is a delinquent child for committing an act that would be an offense if committed by an adult, the court at a hearing shall transfer the case for criminal prosecution to the appropriate court having jurisdiction of the offense if the child was fourteen years of age or older at the time of the act charged, if there is probable cause to believe that the child committed the act charged, and if one or more of the following applies to the child or the act charged: {¶ 35} “* * * {¶ 36} “(4) The act charged is a category two offense, * * * the child was sixteen years of age or older at the time of the commission of the act charged, and either or both of the following apply to the child: {¶ 37} “* * * {¶ 38} “(b) The child is alleged to have had a firearm on or about the child’s person or under the child’s control while committing the act charged and to have displayed the firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated possession of the firearm, or used the firearm to facilitate the commission of the act charged.” R.C. 2151.26(B)(4)(b).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.