Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 OHIOST3D 607 - Pegan v. Crawmer

Pegan v. Crawmer’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Chari v. Vore (2001), Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996)

94 state decisions

3701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hammond v. Dallman · 55 Ohio App. 2d 246 - Harshaw v. Farrell · 51 Ohio App. 3d 133 - In Re Habeas Corpus for Terry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, application is by petition that contains certain information. R.C. 2725.04 . Then, if the court decides that the petition states a facially valid claim, it must allow the writ. R.C. 2725.06 . Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the clerk issues it, and service may be by a sheriff or other person deputed by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.