Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Okla. Crim. 167 - Ex Parte Wright

73 Okla. Crim. 167 - Ex Parte Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1964
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1964

8 state decisions

40194119501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 72 Okla. Crim. 91 - Potts v. State · 73 Okla. Crim. 155 - In Re Gable · 73 Okla. Crim. 13 - Baker v. State · State v. Chambers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * on the 29th day of January, 1951, Sidney E. Massie and Johnnie J. Barnett then and there being, did then and there, willfully, unlawfully, wrongfully, intentionally, feloniously and conjointly, and common design, with the hands and fists of said Sidney E. Massie and Johnnie J. Barnett, malee an assault in and upon the person and body of C. P. Hix, then and there and thereby putting the said C. P. Hix in fear of immediate injury to his life and person by threatening to then and there beat, wound, and inflict physical injury upon said C. P. Hix, and did then and there and thereby use of said force in putting in fear, unlawfully, wilfully, wrongfully and feloniously, and against the will and consent of him, the said C. P. Hix, take, steal and carry away from the possession and person of the said C. P. Hix certain personal property, to-wit: Five Dollars ($5.00) lawful money of the United States, with the unlawful, wrongful, and felonious intent then and there on the part of them, the said Sidney E. Massie and Johnnie J. Barnett, to rob and deprive the said C. P. Hix of said property and' to convert the same to the use and benefit of them, the said Sidney E. Massie and Johnnie J. Barnett, * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.