73 Okla. Crim. 21 - Ex Parte Vanderburg’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 1968 · most notably 85 Okla. Crim. 173 - Ex Parte Matthews (1947), 91 Okla. Crim. 359 - Tilghman v. Burns (1950)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 32 Okla. Crim. 217 - Ex Parte Grant · 73 Okla. Crim. 38 - Ex Parte Tollison · 37 Okla. Crim. 118 - Ex Parte Owens · 56 Okla. Crim. 258 - Ex Parte Thomas · 29 Okla. Crim. 80 - Ex Parte Barnette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““'Where a prisoner in custody under sentence of conviction seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus, the inquiry is limited to the questions whether the court in which the prisoner was convicted had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of the crime charged, and did the court have jurisdiction to render the particular judgment.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.