73 Okla. Crim. 404 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1962
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 64 Okla. Crim. 382 - Luellen v. State · 68 Okla. Crim. 455 - Barfield v. State · 73 Okla. Crim. 184 - Mitchell v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 72 - Tacker v. State · 69 Okla. Crim. 330 - Marks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It shall be unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or who is a habitual user of narcotic drugs, and the having on or about one’s person or in said vehicle of said intoxicating liquor is prima facie evidence of a violation of this Act, to operate or drive a motor vehicle on any highway within this State, as defined in Section 1, of this Act, and any person violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not more than one year, or by fine of not more than Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars, or by both imprisonment and fine.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An information which charges that a motor car was operated on ‘the street of Broadway in the city of Fairview and County of Major, and on streets adjacent thereto’, is sufficient allegation that it was such a highway as contemplated by Oklahoma Statutes * * ⅜ »”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.