State v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2020
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 125 Wash. 2d 769 - State v. Calle · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · 127 Wash. 2d 95 - State v. Gocken · 99 Wash. 2d 413 - State v. Vladovic · 87 Wash. 2d 374 - State v. Arndt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a strong presumption that the legislature intended separate punishment for each offense, even if they are committed in a single act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tanberg“`serves to protect individuals from loss of property and threat of violence to their persons.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tanberg“[t]he assault and robbery statutes do not address identical evils.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tanberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.