Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 SO2D 226 - Wood v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Wood v. Sinclair Refining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1967
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 59 So. 2d 20 - Quality Courts United v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the plaintiffs could have plead both causes of action and now, according to our interpretation of the order, they may proceed ex contractu, so the effect of the order was to allow an amendment though, evidently, the plaintiffs had not sought that privilege “As we construe the order in the light of what has been and what may be decided, we do not find that it has the characteristics of a final judgment * * (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.