Schneider v. Cohan’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke · Magnant Ex Rel. Magnant v. Peacock · Barry v. Robson · American Airmotive Corp. v. Stutz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An appeal from a final judgment at law must be taken `within sixty days from and after the entry of the * * * judgment * * * appealed from.' Sec. 59.08, F.S. 1951, F.S.A. So far as appellate jurisdiction is concerned, the date of the signing of the judgment by the Circuit Judge or the date the same is filed in the Clerk's office or the date the same is noted in the Progress Docket is of no consequence. The time begins to run from the effective day of the judgment and that is the day it is actually entered, that is to say, recorded, in the Circuit Court minute book. See Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke, 156 Fla. 638 , 24 So.2d 310, 311 . The same rule applies to appeals from final decrees in Chancery, the only difference being that Chancery decrees are required to be entered, that is, recorded, in the Chancery Order Book. See Magnant v. Peacock, 156 Fla. 688 , 24 So.2d 314, 315 , and the cases there cited; Barry v. Robson, Fla. 1953, 65 So.2d 739, 740 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Salinger v. Salinger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.