73 So. 2d 694 - McVeigh v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

cited by 30 later decisions

states following

January 2009

most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Heiney v. State (1984), Woods v. State (1999)

29 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington Times Co. v. Bonner · Talley v. State · Hunt v. State · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Shouse · Armstrong v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““This court is committed to the rule that a new trial will not be granted for newly discovered evidence unless such evidence was discovered after the former trial, that due diligence must have been shown to have it at the former trial, that it must be material to the issue, it must go to the merits of the case, it must not be cumulative and it must be such as would produce a different verdict. * * * ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Collett v. State · 87 So. 2d 582 - Harvey v. State
“"[S]hall be summoned to testify at the trial and shall be examined by the court and may be examined by counsel for the state and the defendant." (p. 697)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 238 So. 2d 817 - Parkin v. State · 222 So. 2d 457 - Parkin v. State
“Under this state of facts it was perfectly apparent why defendant did not want to go to the police station where he would be confronted with his criminal history. Even though such evidence proved the commission of another and different crime, it was admissible to show motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 570 So. 2d 1343 - State v. Escobar

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.