Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 So. 3d 1223 - Ex Parte As

73 So. 3d 1223 - Ex Parte As’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 564 So. 2d 950 - Ex Parte Beasley · 810 So. 2d 631 - Ex Parte Fann · In Re Interest of Joshua · T.V. v. B.S. · V.M. v. State Dept. of Human Resources

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[t]he grandmother's maintaining custody of the child and having the ability to determine and supervise the mother's visitation with the child is a viable alternative to termination of the mother's parental rights while the mother is making progress towards rehabilitation. Thus, the juvenile court's decision to terminate her parental rights appears to be premature."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If the juvenile court finds from clear and convincing evidence, competent, material, and relevant in nature, that the parents of a child are unable or unwilling to discharge their responsibilities to and for the child, or that the conduct or condition of the parents renders them unable to properly care for the child and that the conduct or condition is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future, it may terminate the parental rights of the parents. In determining whether or not the parents are unable or unwilling to discharge their responsibilities to and for the child and to terminate the parental rights, the juvenile court shall consider the following factors including, but not limited to, the following: [[Image here]] “(2) Emotional illness, mental illness, or mental deficiency of the parent, or excessive use of alcohol or controlled substances, of a duration or nature as to render the parent unable to care for needs of the child. [[Image here]] “(4) Conviction of and imprisonment for a felony. [[Image here]] “(9) Failure by the parents to provide for the material needs of the child or to pay a reasonable portion of support of the child, where the parent is able to do so. [[Image here]] “(11) Failure by the parents to maintain consistent contact or communication with the child. “(12) Lack of effort by the parent to adjust his or her circumstances to meet the needs of the child in accordance with agreements reached, including agreements reached with local departments of h”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"In order to terminate an individual's parental rights, the trial court must find by clear and convincing evidence that the child is dependent and that an alternative less drastic than the termination of parental rights is not available. § 12-15-319, Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Beasley , 564 So. 2d 950 , 952 (Ala. 1990). 'The trial court's decision in proceedings to terminate parental rights is presumed to be correct when the decision is based upon ore tenus evidence, and such a decision based upon such evidence will be set aside only if the record shows it to be plainly and palpably wrong.' Ex parte State Dep't of Human Res. , 624 So. 2d 589 , 593 (Ala. 1993). 'This presumption is based on the trial court's unique position to directly observe the witnesses and to assess their demeanor and credibility.' Ex parte Fann , 810 So. 2d 631 , 633 (Ala. 2001). The party seeking to terminate parental rights, however, has the burden of presenting clear and convincing evidence showing that the parent whose rights are at stake is not capable of discharging, or is unwilling to discharge, his or her parental responsibilities and that no viable alternatives to terminating his or her parental rights exist. Ex parte Ogle , 516 So. 2d 243 , 247 (Ala. 1987) ; see also K.W. v. J.G. , 856 So. 2d 859 , 874 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003) (holding that the party seeking to terminate a parent's rights bears the burden of proving that the termination of those rights is the appropriate remedy)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.