73 So. 3d 567 - Jamison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · McClain v. State · United States of America v. Fabian Aguayo-Delgado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“According to the Mississippi Supreme Court, if the amendment either (1) “materially alters facts which are the essence of the offense on the face of the indictment as it originally stood or” (2) “materially alters a defense to the indictment as it originally stood so as to prejudice the defendant’s case,” then the amendment is substantive, and approval by the grand jury is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.