Chaney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Hatter · State v. Tokar · State v. Chaney · Egelhoff v. Egelhoff ex rel. Breiner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is all too tempting for a defendant to second-guess counsel's assistance after conviction or adverse sentence, and it is all too easy for a court, examining counsel’s defense after it has proved unsuccessful, to conclude that a particular act or omission of counsel was unreasonable.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , quoted in Chaney v. State, 73 S.W.3d 843, 847 (Mo.App.2002). Thus, our”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. KEIGHTLEY v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.