Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 TEX 47 - Dillingham v. Russell

Dillingham v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
7
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 1984 · most notably Brabham v. Mississippi ex rel. Smith (1938), Malott v. Shimer (1899)

11 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

21018891890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No court can interfere with the custody of property held by another court through a receiver, but may establish by its judgment a debt against the receivership, which must be recognized even by the court appointing the receiver, and is not open to revision by it if the court rendering the judgment had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and the parties. The manner in which a judgment so rendered shall be paid, and the adjustment of equities between all persons having claims on the property and effects in the hands of a receiver made, must necessarily be under the coptrol of the court having custody through its receiver, but this does not affect the jurisdiction of other courts conclusively to establish by judgment the existence and extent of a claim.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to constitute one a wrongdoer by ratification the original act must have been done in his interest, or been intended to further some purpose of his own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.