Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 U.S. 83 - Wilson v. Wall

Wilson v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis

73 U.S. 83 · 1867

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. (1906), Charlton v. Kelly (1913)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1801867187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A chancellor will not be astute to charge a constructive trust upon one who has acted honestly, and paid a full and fair consideration without knowledge.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Now, while it is freely conceded that this construction given to the treaty should form a rule for the subsequent conduct of the department, it cannot affect titles before given by the government, nor does it pretend to do so. Congress has no constitutional power to settle the rights under treaties except in cases purely political. The construction of them is the peculiar province of the judiciary, when a case shall arise between individuals. The legislature may prescribe to the Executive how any mere administrative act shall be performed, and such was the only aim and purpose of this act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.