Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Utah 404 - Papanikolas v. Sampson

Papanikolas v. Sampson’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2004

1 district · 8 state decisions

30192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nanos v. Harrison · Kelly v. Ellis · Kritzer v. Moffat · Corder v. O'Neill · Kiser v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There can be no fraud where there is nothing wrong, and fraud cannot be deduced or inferred from that which the law pronounces honest. Nor can it be predicated upon acts which the party charged has a right by law to do, provided he pursues such right by lawful means, nor upon the nonperformance of acts which by law he is not bound to do, whatever may be his motive, design, or purpose, either in doing or not doing the acts complained of * * *. Nor, as a general rule, can fraud be predicated upon the failure to perform a promise or contract which is unenforceable under the statute of frauds, since in such case the promisor has not, in a legal sense, made a contract, and hence has the right, both in law and in equity, to refuse to perform.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If there was any substantial evidence upon which the jury could find for the plaintiffs under the pleadings, the court erred in directing the verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.