Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

73 Vt. 265

State v. Wells

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 5, 1901

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1901-08-05

Prosecution for the violation of certain ordinances of the City of Barre. Tried by a City Court jury in the City Court of Barre, Pay, J. Verdict and judgment of guilty were rendered, and the respondent, January 14, 1901, was sentenced to pay a fine of one dollar and the costs of prosecution. The respondent excepted.

Decided 1901-08-05

Tyler, J.

¶1This is a prosecution upon a complaint by the attorney of the City of Barre for the alleged violation by the respondent, as city treasurer, of certain city ordinances. The case comes here upon exceptions to the overruling of the general and special demurrers to the several counts in the complaint, and upon exceptions to the rulings and charge of the City Court where there was a trial, conviction and judgment.

¶2The state’s attorney filed a motion in this court to dismiss the respondent’s exceptions on the ground that they and the transcript were not filed as the law requires.

¶3Section 27 of the charter provides that exceptions in criminal cases may be taken to the judgments, rulings and orders of the City Court, upon questions of law, to the Supreme Court, in the same manner and under the same regulations as provided by law for exceptions in the County Court; and in *267such cases a full transcript of the proceedings, properly certified by the judge, together with the exceptions, shall be filed with the county clerk within thirty days from the date of judgment.

¶4In this case the exceptions were duly filed with the county-clerk, but the required transcript was not filed until after the expiration of the thirty days. The city judge certifies, and we assume it to be true, that he filed with the exceptions a certified copy of his docket entries, but this was not a compliance with the law. He also certifies that he filed with the exceptions all the original files in the case. These files are not before us, but while they were sent to the county clerk, it is not probable that they were in fact filed by him, for it appears in the judge’s certificate that the county clerk notified him that a transcript was required, and that he notified the judge that the original files would be returned to him and that they were in fact returned.

¶5For non-compliance with the requirements of the charter the exceptions must be dismissed. If the transcript may be filed three days after the expiration of the prescribed time, it may be filed thirty days after that time, and the purpose of requiring it to be filed would be defeated; for it is apparent that in many cases the exceptions would be entirely meaningless without the transcript.

¶6Exceptions dismissed.

/73/vt/265 · .json · Public domain