Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Wash. 2d 660 - State v. Huson

73 Wash. 2d 660 - State v. Huson’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
7
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably 110 Wash. 2d 504 - State v. Belgarde (1988), 98 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bonds (1982)

3 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

2301968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · People v. French · 49 Wash. 2d 66 - State v. Case · 50 Wash. 2d 740 - State v. Collins · 56 Wash. 2d 596 - City of Seattle v. Harclaon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] public prosecutor is a quasi-judicial officer”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “every act of the defendant's life was admissible”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Testing the referenced statements in the light of the record in this case, we find: (1) that defendant’s trial counsel is a highly competent, experienced criminal trial attorney; (2) that at no stage of the proceedings did he make objection to the remarks attributed to the prosecutor; (3) that the opportunity for objection was constantly available; (4) that no curative instruction was requested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.