Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 73 Wash. App. 225 - State v. Randall

73 Wash. App. 225 - State v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably State v. Armenta (1997), State v. Armenta (1997)

24 state decisions

160199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Reasonable suspicion, like probable cause, is dependent upon both the content of information possessed by police and its degree of reliability. Both factors — quantity and quality — are considered in the ‘totality of the circumstances — the whole picture,' United States v. Cortez, 449 U. S. 411, 417 [, 66 L. Ed. 2d 621 , 101 S. Ct. 690 ] (1981), that must be taken into account when evaluating whether there is reasonable suspicion.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An officer acting on a tip involving the threat of violence and rapidly developing events does not have the opportunity to undertake a methodical, measured inquiry into whether the tip is reliable, as does an officer acting on a tip that a nonviolent offense such as possession of drugs has been committed, or an officer seeking a search warrant based on a tip. Rather, when acting on a tip that a violent offense has just been committed, as here, the officer must make a swift decision based upon a quick evaluation of the information available at the instant his or her decision is made. To require an officer under these circumstances to stop and undertake an in-depth analysis of the reliability of the information received by the police dispatcher would greatly impede the officer's discharge of duty and would greatly increase the threat to the public safety.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[N]o single rule can be fashioned to meet every conceivable confrontation between the police and citizen. Evaluating the reasonableness of the police action and the extent of the intrusion, each case must be considered in light of the particular circumstances facing the law enforcement officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.