73 Wash. App. 486 - State v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 828 - State v. Fjermestad · 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · 120 Wash. 2d 394 - Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security Department · 99 Wash. 2d 75 - State v. Barr · 66 Wash. App. 791 - State v. Landrum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In its dispositional order, the court shall require the respondent to make restitution to any persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of the offense committed by the respondent.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Donahoe · State v. AMR“`any person who has sustained physical or financial injury to person or property as a direct result of the crime charged.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Donahoe · State v. AMR“reimbursement by the offender to the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. AMR
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.