73 Wash. App. 596 - Sherrell v. Selfors’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably In Re Personal Restraint of Gentry (1999), In Re Dependency of TLG (2005)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 95 - Thomas v. French · 115 Wash. 2d 194 - Fay v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · 107 Wash. 2d 693 - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. Holman · 89 Wash. 2d 190 - Seattle-First National Bank v. Brommers · 57 Wash. App. 707 - In the Matter of Marriage of Stern
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the severed trees, together with other damages that are a normal consequence of the logging operation. See, e.g., Henriksen v. Lyons, 33 Wash.App. 123, 127 , 652 P.2d 18 (1982), review denied, 99 Wash.2d 1001 (1983); Bremerton Central Lions Club, Inc., [ v. Manke Lumber Co., 25 Wash.App. 1 ] at 7[, 604 P.2d 1325 (1979)]. When the damage is to a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Conflicting evidence is substantial if that evidence reasonably substantiates the finding even though there are other reasonable interpretations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Whenever any person shall cut down, girdle or otherwise injure, or carry off any tree, timber or shrub on the land of another person, or on the street or highway in front of any person’s house, village, town or city lot, or cultivated grounds, or on the commons or public grounds of any village, town or city, or on the street or highway in front thereof, without lawful authority, in an action by such person, village, town or city against the person committing such trespasses or any of them, if judgment be given for the plaintiff, it shall be given for treble the amount of damages claimed or assessed therefor, as the case may be.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.