73 Wash. App. 838 - State v. Cortez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2020
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ackermann v. United States · Klapprott v. United States · Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell · Landon v. Plasencia · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where the interests of justice most urgently require.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A vacation under section (5) is limited to extraordinary circumstances not covered by any other section of the rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“presented no evidence to indicate he did not understand the rights set forth in his plea agreement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.